Join the 2026-2027 research fellows cohort:  Learn More

Donate
<

1

  • Campaigns
  • Donate
  • About Us
  • Join Us
  • !
    Programs
  • !
    Research

Position paper rondetafelgesprek neurodiversiteit

Stichting Neurodiversiteit / Neurodiversity Foundation

Aan: Leden van de Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal
Betreft: Neurodiversiteit, rechtsbescherming en maatschappelijke deelname
Datum: 15 Juni

1. Kernboodschap

De Stichting Neurodiversiteit is blij dat de Tweede Kamer ruimte maakt voor een rondetafelgesprek over neurodiversiteit. Tegelijk willen wij eerlijk zijn: het is laat dat dit gesprek nu pas structureel wordt gevoerd, en daarom hopen we op politieke actie, die we makkelijker maken door het benoemen van 14 mogelijke moties om Nederland vriendelijker te maken voor onze gemarginaliseerde groep. We zijn op zoek, naar politici en politieke partijen, die hoop geven, aan neurodivergente nederlanders, voor een gelijkwaardiger toekomst. 

Neurodivergente mensen - waaronder autistische mensen, ADHD’ers, dyslectische mensen, dyscalculische mensen, mensen met dyspraxie/DCD, Tourette, hoogbegaafdheid, taalontwikkelingsstoornissen, sensorische verwerkingsverschillen en andere neurodivergente variaties - lopen dagelijks tegen maatschappelijke barrières aan. In onderwijs, werk, zorg, wonen, inkomen, publieke dienstverlening en bij uitvoeringsinstanties worden zij nog te vaak beoordeeld volgens één normatief beeld van functioneren.

Wij willen toe naar een Nederland waarin het VN-verdrag Handicap volledig wordt nageleefd, en waarin bestaande maatschappelijke barrières voor neurodivergente mensen actief worden verminderd door politieke keuzes. Niet door neurodivergente mensen verder te dwingen zich aan te passen aan systemen die hen uitsluiten of beschadigen, maar door die systemen toegankelijker, rechtvaardiger en menswaardiger te maken.

Daarom vragen wij de Tweede Kamer om vijf prioritaire stappen:

  1. Maak discriminatie op grond van neurodivergentie zichtbaar en bestrijdbaar.
  2. Voer de aangenomen ABA-motie daadwerkelijk uit en voorkom commerciële herlabeling.
  3. Bescherm neurodivergente Wajongers tegen ondeskundige beoordelingen en bestaansonzekerheid.
  4. Investeer structureel in neurodiversiteitskennis bij UWV, gemeenten en uitvoeringsinstanties.
  5. Erken Neurodiversity Pride Day op 16 juni officieel als dag van neurodivergente trots, gelijkwaardigheid en inclusie.

Deze vijf punten combineren bescherming, rechtszekerheid, kennis en erkenning. Dat is nodig. Neurodivergente mensen hebben niet alleen behoefte aan zorg of ondersteuning, maar ook aan waardigheid, bestaanszekerheid, gelijke behandeling en het recht om als zichzelf mee te doen.

2. Waarom politieke actie nu nodig is

In Nederland bestaan al belangrijke wettelijke en beleidsmatige kaders. Mensen met een beperking of chronische ziekte moeten kunnen meedoen op school, op het werk, in het openbaar vervoer en in hun vrije tijd. Dat is verankerd in de Wet gelijke behandeling op grond van handicap of chronische ziekte, de Grondwet en het VN-verdrag Handicap. Ook werkt de overheid via de Werkagenda VN-verdrag Handicap 2025-2030 toe naar betere naleving van het verdrag.

Maar in de praktijk blijft neurodivergentie te vaak onzichtbaar. In rapportages over discriminatie wordt neurodivergentie zelden apart genoemd. In onderwijsbeleid gaat het vaak over “passend” of “inclusief” onderwijs, maar basiskennis over neurodiversiteit is nog geen vanzelfsprekend onderdeel van iedere leraren- of ambtenarenopleiding. Bij UWV, gemeenten en zorginstanties hangen beoordelingen te vaak af van toevallige kennis van individuele medewerkers. En in de zorgmarkt bestaan nog steeds verdienmodellen rond “marteltherapie aba” die door autistische mensen, ook nog steeds, als schadelijke kindermisbehandeling en als traumatiserend worden beoordeeld.

Dit is, zoals ook de onderzoeken van H. Bruintjes laten zien, geen marginaal probleem. Het gaat om een grote groep burgers die vaak veel talent, creativiteit, doorzettingsvermogen en maatschappelijke waarde meebrengt, maar tegelijkertijd structureel wordt belemmerd door systemen die onvoldoende zijn ontworpen voor verschillende manieren van denken, leren, communiceren, voelen en verwerken.

Wij vragen de Kamer daarom om neurodiversiteit niet langer te laten ondersneeuwen in algemene termen als “handicap”, “kwetsbaarheid”, “ggz”, “passend onderwijs” of “arbeidsparticipatie”. Neurodivergente mensen verdienen specifieke aandacht, omdat hun barrières specifiek zijn.

3. Onze vijf prioritaire verzoeken aan de Tweede Kamer

1. Maak discriminatie op grond van neurodivergentie zichtbaar en bestrijdbaar

Discriminatie van neurodivergente mensen wordt vaak niet herkend als discriminatie. Het wordt verpakt als “niet passend in het team”, “te ingewikkeld”, “te intensief”, “niet flexibel genoeg”, “communicatief lastig”, “niet leerbaar”, “niet zelfstandig genoeg” of “niet representatief”. Daardoor blijft structurele uitsluiting buiten beeld.

Wij vragen de Kamer, aansluitend op het aanbieden van de petitie Franciscus (“Stop discriminatie op basis van neurodiversiteit”) dit jaar, om de regering te verzoeken om discriminatie op grond van neurodivergentie expliciet zichtbaar te maken in bestaande discriminatiemonitoring. Dat kan als subcategorie binnen bestaande gronden, zoals handicap/chronische ziekte, of als aparte beleidsmatige registratiecategorie. De infrastructuur bestaat al: gemeentelijke antidiscriminatievoorzieningen, politie, Meld.Online Discriminatie, het College voor de Rechten van de Mens, de Nationale Ombudsman en de Kinderombudsman registreren en behandelen al discriminatiemeldingen.

Zonder registratie is er geen zicht. Zonder zicht is er geen beleid. Zonder beleid blijft neurodivergente discriminatie bestaan als iets wat mensen individueel moeten dragen, in plaats van iets wat de overheid structureel moet bestrijden.

Voorstel voor motie:
Verzoekt de regering om, in overleg met antidiscriminatievoorzieningen, politie, Meld.Online Discriminatie, het College voor de Rechten van de Mens, de Nationale Ombudsman en de Kinderombudsman, te verkennen hoe discriminatie op grond van neurodivergentie expliciet zichtbaar kan worden geregistreerd, gemonitord en gerapporteerd binnen bestaande discriminatiecijfers en mensenrechtenrapportages.

Daarnaast vragen wij de Kamer om te onderzoeken hoe publieke middelen, subsidies, inkoopvoorwaarden en kwaliteitskaders kunnen voorkomen dat organisaties die neurodivergente mensen structureel discrimineren of beschadigen, publieke steun of beleidsinvloed blijven ontvangen.

2. Voer de aangenomen ABA-motie daadwerkelijk uit en voorkom commerciële herlabeling

De Tweede Kamer heeft al een belangrijke stap gezet met de aangenomen motie over het beperken van ABA-behandelingen intensiever dan één uur per week. Dit is een geweldige stap, want jonge autisten krijgen nu minder vaak ‘marteltherapie’ die door de staat gefinancierd word. Maar die moedige motie, van Agnes Joseph moet nu worden uitgevoerd, zonder dat dit verwaterd wordt door de commerciële belangen van enkele winstgerichte bedrijven.

Onze zorg is dat commerciële aanbieders die verdienen aan deze schadelijke ‘methodes’  hun verdienmodel zullen proberen te behouden. Dat kan door andere namen te gebruiken, door kamerleden voor de gek te houden, door schadelijke praktijken zachter te formuleren, of door ABA-achtige interventies te presenteren als algemene begeleiding, ontwikkeltraining of gedragstherapie.

Daarom vragen wij Kamerleden om waakzaam te zijn. Wanneer autistische kinderen langdurig worden blootgesteld aan methoden die gericht zijn op gehoorzaamheid, gedragsonderdrukking, maskering en normalisering van autistisch gedrag, spreken wij niet over onschuldige ondersteuning. Voor veel autistische mensen voelt dit niet als zorg, maar als een vorm van betaalde onderwerping,van geforceerde “autismeconversie”, vergelijkbaar met “homogenezing”. Wij vinden dat publieke middelen nooit mogen worden gebruikt voor praktijken die de waardigheid, autonomie en natuurlijke communicatie van autistische kinderen aantasten. Een moedige politicus, zo hopen we al jaren, zal ooit de volledige stopzetting van de financiering hiervan, en de her-allocatie van deze middelen voor nuttige therapien, bewerkstellen, tot die tijd moet de motie van Agnes Joseph streng gehandhaafd worden.  

Voorstel voor motie:
Verzoekt de regering aan de Kamer te rapporteren hoe de aangenomen motie-Joseph over ABA-behandelingen intensiever dan één uur per week wordt uitgevoerd, inclusief toezicht, registratie, gemeentelijke instructie, betrokkenheid van autistische ervaringsdeskundigen en maatregelen tegen herlabeling van ABA-praktijken onder andere namen.

Aanvullend voorstel voor motie:
Verzoekt de regering om gemeenten actief te instrueren dat intensieve ABA-behandelingen boven één uur per week niet publiek bekostigd mogen worden, en dat aanbieders die ABA-achtige praktijken onder andere namen aanbieden niet via jeugdhulp, Wmo, onderwijszorgarrangementen of andere publieke routes alsnog financiering krijgen voor deze vorm van winstvergaring ten koste van onze doelgroep, en ten koste van goede hulp.

3. Bescherm neurodivergente Wajongers tegen ondeskundige beoordelingen en bestaansonzekerheid

Wij ontvangen te veel signalen van neurodivergente mensen die zich door UWV-processen niet begrepen, niet geloofd of verkeerd beoordeeld voelen. Neurodivergente belastbaarheid is vaak complex. Mensen kunnen jarenlang maskeren, boven hun vermogen functioneren, wisselende belastbaarheid hebben, overprikkeling verbergen, sociaal wenselijke antwoorden geven of pas na afloop instorten. Wie daar geen kennis van heeft, kan gemakkelijk verkeerde conclusies trekken.

Dat is ernstig, omdat UWV-besluiten direct raken aan bestaanszekerheid. Een verkeerde beoordeling kan leiden tot inkomensverlies, stress, gezondheidsverslechtering, bezwaarprocedures en verlies van vertrouwen in de overheid.

De actuele zorgen rond het einde van Wajong-rechten of garantiebedragen na vijf jaar werken maken dit extra urgent. Juist mensen die proberen mee te doen, mogen niet worden gestraft doordat het systeem hun ondersteuningsbehoefte te beperkt begrijpt.

Voorstel voor motie:
Verzoekt de regering om neurodivergente Wajongers bij beëindiging, herbeoordeling of wijziging van hun uitkering toegang te geven tot een laagdrempelige bezwaar- en herstelroute, onafhankelijke ondersteuning, duidelijke hardheidscriteria en beoordeling door medewerkers met aantoonbare kennis van neurodivergentie.

Aanvullend voorstel voor motie:
Verzoekt de regering om middelen vrij te maken voor verplichte scholing van UWV-medewerkers die besluiten nemen over Wajong en arbeidsvermogen, met aandacht voor autisme, ADHD, masking, wisselende belastbaarheid, executieve functies, prikkelverwerking, herstelbehoefte, communicatieverschillen en neurodivergente burn-out.

4. Investeer structureel in neurodiversiteitskennis bij gemeenten en uitvoeringsinstanties

Veel problemen ontstaan niet door kwade wil, maar door gebrek aan kennis. Dat maakt de gevolgen niet minder ernstig.

Een leerling die overprikkeld raakt, wordt gezien als lastig. Een student die vastloopt in planning, wordt gezien als ongemotiveerd. Een autistische volwassene die niet snel antwoordt, wordt gezien als ontwijkend. Een ADHD’er met administratieve problemen wordt gezien als nalatig. Iemand die jarenlang heeft gemaskeerd, wordt te belastbaar ingeschat. Iemand die procedurele stress niet aankan, wordt verantwoordelijk gemaakt voor een systeem dat niet toegankelijk is.

Wij vragen dat neurodiversiteitskennis een basiseis wordt voor professionals die betaald worden door de overheid en beslissingen nemen over onderwijs, ondersteuning, zorg, inkomen, werk en rechtsbescherming. Zo lang deze kennis achterstand er is, zullen er geen correcte besluiten genomen kunnen worden. 

Voorstel voor motie:
Verzoekt de regering om neurodiversiteit verplicht en concreet op te nemen in opleidingen en onboardingstrajecten voor relevante ambtenaren, met aandacht voor basis kennis en de houding van de ambtenaar richten zijn client of partner.

Aanvullend voorstel voor motie:
Verzoekt de regering om neurodiversiteitskennis structureel op te nemen in de scholing, kwaliteitscriteria en toetsingskaders van gemeenten, UWV, Wmo-consulenten, jeugdteams, leerplichtambtenaren, indicatiestellers, inspecties en andere uitvoeringsorganisaties.

5. Erken Neurodiversity Pride Day officieel op 16 juni

Naast bescherming is erkenning nodig. Neurodivergente mensen krijgen vaak vooral aandacht wanneer het gaat over problemen, kosten, diagnoses, tekorten of zorgvragen. Dat beeld is onvolledig en schadelijk.

Neurodiversity Pride Day laat een ander beeld zien: neurodivergente mensen als volwaardige burgers, leerlingen, werknemers, onderzoekers, makers, ouders, kunstenaars, vrijwilligers, leiders en gemeenschapsbouwers. De dag is ontstaan vanuit Nederland, wordt breed ondersteunt door de neurodivergente gemeenschap zelf en wordt jaarlijks op 16 juni gevierd. Het is een dag van trots, zelfacceptatie, zichtbaarheid en verbondenheid. Wat hier begon in Nederland, wordt op deze 9e editie in 2026, in meer dan 50 landen gevierd, gedurende 7 dagen land (Neurodiversity Pride Week) en is na de LGTBQ Pride (die nog veel groter is) de grootste pride beweging in de wereld…. maar het begon hier, en het wordt wereldwijd gecoördineerd vanuit ons land: ND Pride is feitelijk ‘made in nl’, en we smachten als gemeenschap naar de erkenning, net als de LGTBQ beweging dit decennia geleden ook kreeg. 

Officiële erkenning van Neurodiversity Pride Day kost weinig, maar betekent veel. Het geeft gemeenten, scholen, werkgevers, ministeries en publieke instellingen een extra suggestie voor een jaarlijks moment om niet alleen over neurodivergente mensen te spreken, maar hen zichtbaar te waarderen. In beide eerdere kamer cohorten is hierover positief gesproken door toenmalige staatssecretarissen, maar definitieve actie is nooit ondernomen: Voor  de 10e editie in 16 Juni 2027: Erken de 16e van Juni als officiële dag. 

Voorstel voor motie:
Verzoekt de regering om Neurodiversity Pride Day op 16 juni officieel te erkennen als jaarlijkse dag van neurodivergente trots, gelijkwaardigheid en inclusie, en gemeenten, scholen, publieke instellingen en overheidsorganisaties aan te moedigen hier jaarlijks aandacht aan te besteden.

4. Aanvullende motievoorstellen

Naast de vijf prioriteiten vragen wij de Kamer om de volgende voorstellen mee te nemen.

A. Begeleid en beschermd wonen: landelijk meldpunt en escalatieprotocol

Er zijn te veel signalen over onveilige, vernederende of ontoereikende behandeling van autistische en andere neurodivergente mensen in begeleid en beschermd wonen. Bewoners zijn vaak afhankelijk van de aanbieder en verkeren daardoor in een kwetsbare positie.

Voorstel voor motie:
Verzoekt de regering om met gemeenten, Wmo-toezichthouders, IGJ en cliëntenorganisaties een landelijk meldpunt en escalatieprotocol te ontwikkelen voor ernstige klachten over begeleid en beschermd wonen voor neurodivergente mensen.

B. Plaatsingsstop en sluiting bij ernstige of herhaalde klachten

Een meldpunt is alleen zinvol als klachten gevolgen hebben. Bij ernstige of herhaalde signalen moet de veiligheid van bewoners zwaarder wegen dan de continuïteit van een aanbieder.

Voorstel voor motie:
Verzoekt de regering te borgen dat bij ernstige, herhaalde of aannemelijke signalen van onveiligheid in begeleid of beschermd wonen onmiddellijk onafhankelijk onderzoek plaatsvindt, met mogelijkheid tot tijdelijke plaatsingsstop, veilige overplaatsing, contractopschorting en sluiting wanneer veiligheid, waardigheid of basale zorgkwaliteit niet gegarandeerd is.

C. Diagnostiek zonder financiële drempel

Wij begrijpen dat volledig kostenvrije diagnostiek voor alle neurodivergente variaties financieel ingewikkeld is, dat dit ook duur kan zijn. We begrijpen dat dit vermoedelijk daarom ook het eerste voorstel is, dat word verworpen: Tegelijk is het inhoudelijk vreemd dat juist de toegangspoort tot ondersteuning, rechtsbescherming, onderwijsaanpassingen, werkvoorzieningen of zelfbegrip afhankelijk kan zijn van eigen risico, private routes, leeftijd, wachttijd, polisvoorwaarden of betaalvermogen.

Diagnostiek is voor veel neurodivergente mensen geen luxeproduct. Het is vaak de sleutel tot passende ondersteuning en bescherming. Voor hen, voor wie de financiele drempel voor deze medische dienst te kostbaar is, vragen we een routeverkenning naar humanitaire coulance, voor deze groep. 

Voorstel voor motie:
Verzoekt de regering om budgettaire scenario’s uit te werken voor het verlagen of wegnemen van financiële drempels bij mentale diagnostiek, met bijzondere aandacht voor volwassenen zonder regulier inkomen, lage inkomens en mensen voor wie diagnostiek noodzakelijk is voor toegang tot onderwijs, werk, zorg, inkomen of rechtsbescherming.

D. Bijverdienen en vrijwilligersvergoeding: participatie niet bestraffen

Voor veel neurodivergente mensen begint participatie met kleine stappen: vrijwilligerswerk, een paar uur meedoen, een creatieve opdracht, een project, een tijdelijke klus of een maatschappelijk initiatief. Het huidige systeem maakt zulke stappen vaak spannend, omdat mensen bang zijn voor verrekening, terugvordering, administratieve druk of verlies van bestaanszekerheid. Niets doen, word dan veiliger, en daar heeft niemand wat aan. 

Wie voorzichtig probeert mee te doen, moet niet worden gestraft alsof participatie misbruik is.

Voorstel voor motie:
Verzoekt de regering te onderzoeken hoe neurodivergente Wajongers en bijstandsgerechtigden meer ruimte kunnen krijgen voor vrijwilligersvergoedingen, kleine inkomsten, projectvergoedingen en geleidelijke participatie zonder disproportionele verrekening of bedreiging van bestaanszekerheid door het afnemen van elke vorm van support.

E. Neuro-inclusieve stages bij maatschappelijke organisaties

Neurodivergente jongeren hebben stages nodig waar begeleiding, veiligheid en ontwikkeling centraal staan. Juist maatschappelijke organisaties kunnen betekenisvolle, rustige, missiegedreven en mensgerichte stageplekken bieden. Maar zij hebben vaak beperkte middelen en kunnen niet altijd stagevergoeding, begeleiding of aanpassingen betalen.

Daardoor missen we een kans. Neurodivergente jongeren verliezen stagekansen, terwijl maatschappelijke organisaties juist plekken kunnen bieden waar zij kunnen groeien. We willen het haalbaarder maken van neurodivergente jongeren een stageplek krijgen, op een plek die hun graag wilt. 

Voorstel voor motie:
Verzoekt de regering een regeling of pilot te ontwikkelen waarmee maatschappelijke organisaties een bescheidden financiele vergoeding krijgen om neurodivergente jongeren stageplekken aan te bieden, inclusief vergoeding voor de uren in begeleiding, stagevergoeding en redelijke aanpassingen.

F. Cognitieve, sensorische en communicatieve toegankelijkheid concretiseren

Toegankelijkheid wordt nog te vaak fysiek ingevuld. Voor neurodivergente mensen zitten barrières vaak in prikkels, onduidelijke communicatie, onvoorspelbare procedures, tempo, sociale verwachtingen, formulieren, wachtruimtes, telefonische bereikbaarheid en gebrek aan herstelruimte.

Voorstel voor motie:
Verzoekt de regering om de begrippen “toegankelijkheid”, “inclusie” en “redelijke aanpassing” concreet uit te werken voor cognitieve, sensorische en communicatieve toegankelijkheid, samen met neurodivergente ervaringsdeskundigen. En aanvullend, om deze criteria toe te voegen, aan de reeds geldende criteria rondom toegankelijkheid. 

G. Maak neurodiversiteit structureel onderdeel van de politieke agenda

Wij zijn blij dat de Tweede Kamer nu een rondetafelgesprek over neurodiversiteit organiseert. Maar één gesprek is niet genoeg. Neurodivergente mensen lopen niet één keer per kabinetsperiode tegen problemen aan, maar dagelijks: in onderwijs, werk, zorg, wonen, inkomen, discriminatie, publieke dienstverlening en uitvoeringspraktijk.

Tot nu toe verdwijnt neurodiversiteit vaak in bredere debatten over handicap, ggz, passend onderwijs, jeugd, arbeidsparticipatie of bestaanszekerheid. Daardoor worden de specifieke barrières van neurodivergente mensen niet goed zichtbaar, en blijven oplossingen te algemeen.

Wij zijn ruim 20% van de bevolking: we vragen de Kamer daarom om neurodiversiteit structureel op de politieke agenda te zetten. Niet als nieuw beleidsterrein naast alles wat al bestaat, maar als noodzakelijke lens binnen bestaand beleid. Dus: Wanneer de Kamer spreekt over inclusief onderwijs, moet neurodiversiteit daarin zichtbaar zijn. Wanneer de Kamer spreekt over arbeidsongeschiktheid, moet neurodivergente belastbaarheid daarin zichtbaar zijn. Wanneer de Kamer spreekt over discriminatie, moet neurologische discriminatie daarin zichtbaar zijn. Wanneer de Kamer spreekt over toegankelijkheid, moet prikkel-, communicatie- en procedurele toegankelijkheid daarin zichtbaar zijn.

Voorstel voor motie:
Verzoekt de regering om jaarlijks ronde tafel gesprek en een jaarlijkse voortgangsbrief neurodiversiteit aan de Tweede Kamer te sturen, waarin per domein wordt gerapporteerd over onderwijs, werk, zorg, wonen, inkomen, discriminatie, toegankelijkheid, uitvoeringsinstanties en erkenning, en deze brief te agenderen voor een jaarlijks commissiedebat.

Aanvullend voorstel voor motie:
Verzoekt de regering om in toekomstige Kamerbrieven over het VN-verdrag Handicap, inclusief onderwijs, arbeidsongeschiktheid, discriminatie en toegankelijkheid expliciet aandacht te besteden aan de gevolgen voor neurodivergente mensen.

 

5. Tot slot

Wij vragen de Tweede Kamer om neurodivergente mensen niet langer alleen te zien door de bril van zorg, probleem, beperking of kosten. Wij vragen om een Nederland waarin neurodivergente mensen veilig kunnen wonen, eerlijk beoordeeld worden, niet worden gediscrimineerd, niet worden blootgesteld aan schadelijke interventies, passende ondersteuning krijgen, toegang hebben tot onderwijs en werk, en zichtbaar trots mogen zijn op wie zij zijn.

Voor neurodivergente mensen, is Nederland ook ons land, ons thuis. En “de overheid’, is ook onze overheid. De vraag is niet of neurodivergente mensen zich genoeg aanpassen aan Nederland. De vraag is of Nederland bereid is zijn publieke systemen zo in te richten dat alle breinen werkelijk kunnen meedoen.

Daarvoor zijn politieke keuzes nodig.
Wij vragen de Tweede Kamer om die keuzes nu te maken. 

Waarde kamerleden: Jullie hebben zeldzaam veel invloed op het leven van neurodivergente Nederlanders, grijp die kans, we hebben jullie nodig in de politieke arena en namens 3 miljoen Neurodivergente medelanders zeggen wij: we rekenen op jullie. Geef onze doelgroep hoop voor de toekomst.

Namens de Neurodiversity Foundation: Tjerk Feitsma, Rosalie Ekstein, Jopie Louwe Kooijmans, Elijah Delsink & Hans Bruintjes.  

Positionpaper

by Tjerk | Jun 5, 2026

The ND Pride Education Campaign is a structured educational initiative designed to help students understand neurodiversity in a clear, accessible, and age-appropriate way.

Most schools still don’t teach what neurodiversity is, how different brains work, or why inclusion matters—leaving many students to navigate these topics socially, where misunderstanding can easily turn into stigma, bullying, or silence.

The campaign provides classroom-ready lesson materials and educational resources that support awareness, respect, and inclusive thinking. Designed for use in schools, classrooms, awareness weeks, special events, and teacher-led discussions, the program helps create a more informed and supportive environment for neurodivergent students.

The Anti-ABA Campaign is an advocacy and awareness initiative that critically examines Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) and its impact on neurodivergent people, particularly autistic individuals. While ABA is often promoted as a standard, evidence-based, and necessary form of support, many autistic people and advocates have shared lived experiences that raise serious ethical concerns about its methods and long-term effects.

Harmful practices can persist when they become normalized, institutionalized, and rarely questioned in public discussions. This campaign centers the voices and experiences of neurodivergent individuals, challenges dominant narratives around behavioral intervention, and creates space for open, informed dialogue about ethics, consent, autonomy, and wellbeing. It is designed for use in advocacy work, education and training, policy discussions, and broader community conversations about neurodiversity and support practices.

The What’s STRONG With You? Campaign is an awareness and culture-change initiative built around a simple but powerful shift in perspective: moving from asking “What’s wrong with you?” to “What’s strong with you?” Too often, schools, workplaces, healthcare systems, and support services focus primarily on deficits—what needs fixing, what is not working, or what is missing—even when the intention is to help.

Over time, people can become defined by problems, gaps, and limitations, shaping both identity and expectations in damaging ways. This campaign encourages a strengths-based approach by reframing language, changing the questions we ask, and inviting people to see neurodivergent individuals through the lens of capability, potential, and contribution.

Through storytelling, public engagement, and practical resources, the campaign supports more positive and empowering conversations in schools, workplaces, coaching environments, public awareness initiatives, and community discussions.

The We’re Nuts Campaign is a bold public awareness campaign that challenges the way neurodivergent people are labeled, perceived, and dismissed by reclaiming language that has often been used against them.

Neurodivergent individuals are frequently subjected to dismissive language, pathologizing labels, and casual insults that shape not only perception, but also behavior, treatment, and social acceptance.

When harmful language goes unchallenged, it reinforces stigma, dehumanizes difference, and helps justify exclusion. This campaign confronts that dynamic directly by reclaiming charged language, flipping its meaning and perspective, and creating powerful moments of reflection, discomfort, and conversation.

Through public storytelling and unapologetic messaging, the campaign encourages people to question the words they use and the assumptions behind them. Designed for awareness campaigns, education and training, social media engagement, and public discourse, it is intended to spark conversations that are often avoided rather than soften them.

The Political Parties Assessment Framework is a structured evaluation tool designed to assess how political parties approach neurodiversity, inclusion, and related policy issues. Political commitments in these areas are often vague, difficult to verify, and hard to compare, making it challenging for voters, advocates, and stakeholders to understand where parties truly stand or what impact their policies may have in practice.

The framework provides clear evaluation criteria focused not only on public statements, but also on policy detail, implementation, accountability, and measurable action. By using comparative and evidence-based analysis, it helps separate rhetoric from genuine commitment and supports more informed public discussion around neurodiversity and inclusion in politics.

The framework is intended for use in policy analysis, advocacy work, public awareness initiatives, and efforts to strengthen political transparency and accountability.

Check-In Prompts for Children is a supportive card set designed to help children recognize, understand, and express their feelings, needs, experiences, and internal body signals—such as stress, hunger, overwhelm, or emotional states—in ways that feel accessible and safe.

Children are often expected to explain complex emotions clearly, self-regulate quickly, and communicate like adults, even when they may not yet have the language, confidence, or emotional awareness to do so. Without the right support, this can lead to frustration, misunderstandings, shutdowns, or distressed behavior.

The card set uses simple and flexible prompts that allow children to communicate verbally, visually, emotionally, or in whatever way works best for them, without pressure or “right” answers. Available in multiple languages and adaptable across different settings, the prompts are designed to encourage connection, understanding, and emotional awareness.

They can be used in home environments, classrooms, therapy and support settings, or as part of everyday check-ins and conversations.

The Interoceptive Awareness Cards are a reflective card set designed to help people recognize, understand, and respond to internal body signals such as hunger, stress, fatigue, tension, overwhelm, and emotional states.

Many people—particularly neurodivergent individuals—can struggle to notice these signals, interpret what they mean, or understand how to respond to them in supportive ways.

Without this awareness, needs may go unrecognized until they become intense, leading to overwhelm, shutdown, burnout, or difficulty with self-regulation. The cards provide gentle prompts and accessible language to help identify internal sensations, build self-awareness, and develop a clearer understanding of physical and emotional states over time.

Designed for flexible and self-paced use, they can support personal reflection, therapy and coaching sessions, educational environments, and everyday regulation and awareness practices.

The Strengths-Based IEP Tool is a practical resource designed to support the development of Individual Education Plans (IEPs) that focus on a student’s strengths, context, and genuine support needs rather than only deficits or areas requiring correction.

Traditional IEP processes often center on gaps, challenges, and behaviors to “fix,” which can shape how students are perceived and treated within educational systems. As a result, many students are reduced to problems to manage, behaviors to correct, or targets to improve, rather than being understood as whole individuals with abilities, interests, and potential.

This tool encourages a strengths-first approach by helping educators and support teams build more balanced, respectful, and effective plans through structured prompts and contextual understanding.

Flexible enough to work across different educational systems and settings, it is designed for IEP development, educator training, inclusive education strategies, and collaborative conversations between schools and families.

The Neuroinclusive Listening Cards are a practical tool designed to help people develop listening skills that better respect and understand neurodivergent communication styles.

Traditional ideas about listening often focus on waiting for a turn to speak, interpreting quickly, or responding efficiently, but this can overlook what meaningful understanding actually requires. Conversations frequently break down when people feel misunderstood, communication signals are misread, or assumptions are used to fill in gaps instead of genuine curiosity and attention.

The cards use guided prompts, reflective scenarios, and practical exercises to encourage slower, more intentional listening that prioritizes understanding over immediate response. By challenging default assumptions and helping people pay closer attention to different communication styles, the tool supports more respectful, effective, and inclusive interactions.

It is designed for use in training sessions, workshops, team communication exercises, facilitation settings, and personal development contexts.

The Post-Traumatic Growth Cards are a reflective card set designed to support thoughtful exploration after difficult or traumatic experiences, without forcing positivity, resolution, or narratives of “growth.”

Conversations around trauma often frame growth as expected, inevitable, or even necessary, which can leave people feeling pressured to find meaning too quickly, reframe pain before they are ready, or demonstrate resilience in ways that feel performative or invalidating.

These cards take a different approach by creating space for complexity, contradiction, uncertainty, and honest reflection without judgment or expectation. Through gentle prompts and self-paced exploration, the cards encourage people to engage with their experiences in whatever way feels appropriate for them, at any stage of their journey.

Suitable for personal reflection, therapeutic or coaching settings, group facilitation, and slow, supported exploration, the cards are designed to prioritize emotional safety, autonomy, and authenticity over forced optimism.

The Brain Strengths Card Deck is a card-based reflection tool designed to help people identify, understand, and talk about their strengths in a way that feels natural, flexible, and free from judgment.

Many traditional strengths tools can feel more like tests, evaluations, or subtle performance reviews, which often causes people to shut down rather than engage openly. People frequently struggle to describe their strengths because the language around strengths is limited, success is often tied only to measurable output, and speaking positively about oneself can feel uncomfortable or performative.

This card deck takes a different approach by encouraging exploration instead of assessment. Each card represents a different type of strength and includes open-ended prompts, reflections, and conversation starters that support curiosity, self-awareness, and discussion without scoring, ranking, or pressure.

Designed for both individual and group use, the deck can be used in coaching sessions, team workshops, educational settings, and personal reflection practices to help people recognize strengths in a more human and meaningful way.

The Post-Traumatic Growth & Neurodivergence publication explores how neurodivergent people experience trauma, recovery, adaptation, and growth in ways that are often overlooked or misunderstood.

Discussions around trauma are frequently framed as linear journeys focused on overcoming adversity, becoming stronger, or finding meaning through suffering, but these narratives can feel unrealistic, invalidating, or even harmful for many people.

Neurodivergent individuals are often pressured to “grow” from harmful experiences, reframe pain as progress, or find positive meaning before they are ready—or when no clear meaning exists at all. This publication takes a more nuanced approach by examining trauma without simplifying it, creating space for non-linear recovery, and validating the complexity, contradiction, and uncertainty that can accompany healing.

Rather than promoting forced optimism, it encourages honest reflection and deeper understanding of how neurodivergence can shape experiences of trauma and recovery. The publication can be used for personal reflection, educational and awareness purposes, coaching and therapeutic contexts, and for supporting others in more compassionate and realistic ways through recovery processes.

The Interest-Based Nervous Systems publication explores how attention, motivation, and engagement often function differently in neurodivergent people, particularly when driven by interest, meaning, curiosity, or emotional relevance rather than obligation alone.

Motivation is frequently misunderstood as a matter of discipline, willpower, consistency, or effort, but these explanations often fail to reflect how many neurodivergent nervous systems actually operate. As a result, people are commonly labeled as lazy, unmotivated, unreliable, or inconsistent when, in reality, their capacity for focus and activation is closely tied to interest, urgency, novelty, connection, or personal significance.

This publication explains the concept of interest-based activation, challenges traditional effort-based models of productivity and motivation, and provides a more accurate framework for understanding engagement and attention regulation. By connecting neuroscience, lived experience, and practical insight, it helps reframe behaviors that are often misinterpreted through deficit-based perspectives.

The publication is designed for use in education and awareness, workplace and school adaptations, personal understanding, coaching, and support contexts.

The Your Brain, Your Flow guide explores how attention, energy, focus, and productivity naturally fluctuate through a neurodiversity-informed lens. Most workplaces, schools, and systems are built around assumptions of consistent focus, linear productivity, and predictable output, but for many people—especially neurodivergent individuals—this does not reflect how their minds and nervous systems actually function.

As a result, people are often judged for fluctuating energy levels, inconsistent output, or non-linear patterns of attention instead of being supported to understand the underlying rhythms behind those experiences. This guide helps people identify their natural cycles of focus and energy, recognize the conditions that support flow and engagement, and reframe inconsistency as something meaningful rather than as failure or lack of effort.

By aligning expectations, work patterns, and environments more closely with real human variability, the guide supports more sustainable and effective ways of functioning. It is designed for personal reflection and planning, workplace and study adjustments, coaching and facilitation contexts, and burnout prevention.

The Beyond Words publication explores communication beyond traditional spoken or written language, focusing on the many ways neurodivergent people express themselves, process information, connect with others, and relate to the world in ways that are often overlooked, misunderstood, or misread.

Communication is commonly defined through narrow expectations such as verbal fluency, eye contact, quick social responses, or conventional body language, and anything outside those norms is frequently labeled as a deficit rather than recognized as a different communication style. As a result, many people are misunderstood because their signals are not recognized, their communication does not match social expectations, or silence and non-traditional expression are incorrectly interpreted as disinterest, confusion, or lack of capability.

This publication expands the definition of communication by exploring non-verbal expression, alternative communication methods, sensory and relational communication, and the complexity behind how people convey meaning and intent. It challenges assumptions about what “clear” communication looks like and provides language for experiences that are often invisible or difficult to describe.

Designed for education and training, communication support contexts, personal reflection, and improving relational understanding, the publication encourages more inclusive and accurate ways of understanding human connection and expression.

The What I Wish You Knew (EN / NL) publication is a collection of personal reflections and firsthand perspectives from neurodivergent people, sharing what they wish others truly understood about their experiences, needs, and ways of moving through the world.

Neurodivergent lives are often misunderstood, oversimplified, or explained by others instead of being heard directly from the people living those experiences themselves. Without authentic firsthand perspectives, assumptions easily fill the gaps, misunderstandings become normalized, and harmful beliefs or behaviors can persist unnoticed. This publication creates space for honest, unfiltered voices that bridge the gap between lived experience and understanding, offering insight into realities that are frequently invisible or difficult to explain.

Through personal storytelling and accessible language, it encourages empathy, reflection, and more informed conversations around neurodiversity. Designed for awareness and education, training and facilitation, personal reflection, and starting meaningful or difficult conversations, the publication helps bring neurodivergent perspectives to the center of the discussion rather than the margins.

The HOPEful Conversations guide is designed to support meaningful, respectful, and more constructive conversations around neurodiversity, identity, support needs, and human difference. Important conversations in these areas often break down because people struggle to find the right language, fear saying the wrong thing, or feel that the emotional stakes are too high.

Without structure or support, discussions can quickly become defensive, avoidant, harmful, or may not happen at all. This guide provides practical conversation prompts, reflective frameworks, and accessible language to help people navigate sensitive topics with greater understanding, dignity, and care. It also offers approaches for handling disagreement, misunderstanding, and emotional complexity without reducing people to stereotypes or assumptions.

By emphasizing agency, respect, and human connection, the guide helps create safer and more productive conversations across a wide range of contexts. It is designed for workplace discussions, family conversations, educational and facilitation settings, and personal relationships.

The Executive Functioning Unlocked guide explores executive functioning through a neurodiversity-informed lens, moving away from deficit-based models that frame executive functioning as simply a list of skills a person “lacks” or must train into compliance.

Traditional approaches often ignore the role of context, environment, stress, motivation, sensory load, and nervous system regulation, leading many people to be unfairly judged for inconsistency, fluctuating focus, difficulty starting tasks, or struggles with completion and organization. Rather than treating these experiences as personal failings, this guide examines executive functioning as something deeply connected to context, energy, meaning, and support systems.

It helps identify patterns, triggers, and barriers while offering alternative and more flexible ways to structure tasks, expectations, and environments without attaching moral judgment to productivity or performance. Designed to support understanding instead of shame, the guide can be used for personal reflection, educational and support settings, workplace adjustments, and coaching or mentoring conversations.

The Beyond Burnout publication explores burnout through a neurodiversity-informed lens, focusing on the systemic and environmental factors that contribute to burnout rather than framing it as personal weakness, poor stress management, or a temporary lapse in resilience.

Burnout is often misunderstood as an individual problem to solve through better habits or short-term recovery, but many neurodivergent people experience repeated cycles of overextension, collapse, recovery, and burnout again because the underlying mismatches in expectations, environments, and support systems remain unchanged. This publication reframes burnout as a response to chronic systemic mismatch rather than personal failure, helping readers identify early warning signs, recognize recurring patterns, and understand the deeper conditions that drive exhaustion and overwhelm.

It also explores recovery in ways that go beyond the traditional “rest and return” model, challenging productivity-first narratives that prioritize output over wellbeing and sustainability. Designed for personal reflection, workplace conversations, coaching and support settings, and policy or wellbeing initiatives, the publication encourages more realistic, compassionate, and sustainable approaches to work, support, and recovery.

The Thriving at Work guide is a practical resource for building genuinely neuroinclusive workplaces by focusing on team design, communication systems, leadership practices, and organizational structures rather than placing the burden solely on individual adjustment. Many workplace neurodiversity initiatives focus heavily on accommodations or celebrating “neurodivergent talent” while leaving the underlying systems, expectations, and working environments unchanged. As a result, neurodivergent employees often continue to experience overload, unclear communication, constant friction, and preventable stress, while these challenges are frequently misread as personal performance or attitude issues rather than signs of systemic mismatch. This guide takes a broader and more sustainable approach by rethinking workplace norms, offering practical adjustments to communication and workflow structures, emphasizing leadership responsibility, and supporting healthier team design that works for a wider range of people. Rather than treating inclusion as an individual exception process, it encourages organizations to build environments where different working styles can genuinely thrive. The guide is designed for team discussions, HR and policy development, leadership alignment, organizational redesign, and wider workplace inclusion initiatives.

The What’s ALIVE in You? publication is a reflective exploration of camouflaging, burnout, survival, and the process of reconnecting with what feels real, meaningful, and alive underneath years of adaptation. Masking is often treated as a skill, a necessity, or even a success strategy, particularly for neurodivergent people navigating environments that reward conformity. What is far less acknowledged is the long-term cost of constantly performing, suppressing needs, or disconnecting from oneself in order to cope.

Many people eventually reach a point where the strategies that once helped them survive stop working. Functioning becomes unsustainable, exhaustion deepens, and life can begin to feel emotionally flat, disconnected, or unreal—yet the response they often receive is to try harder, stay productive, or keep pushing through. This publication creates space to explore those experiences without judgment or forced positivity.

Through reflections on masking and survival, language for disconnection and depletion, and gentle prompts that help people notice what still feels present underneath the exhaustion, the publication supports honest self-exploration at a self-directed pace. Designed for individual reflection, burnout recovery, coaching or group settings, and identity-focused work, it makes space for uncertainty, ambivalence, and the complexity of rebuilding connection with oneself.

The What’s STRONG With You? (Journal for Teens) is a guided reflection journal designed to support neurodivergent teenagers as they navigate identity, pressure, self-understanding, and the challenges of growing up in systems that constantly evaluate them. Teens are surrounded by expectations from schools, peers, social media, and adults, and are often expected to explain who they are before they have had the chance to fully understand themselves. As a result, many end up masking heavily, internalizing blame, disconnecting from their own needs, or feeling pressured to fit into definitions that do not reflect their real experiences.

Most self-development tools expect a level of clarity, confidence, or emotional insight that many teenagers are still developing. This journal takes a different approach by offering short, accessible prompts that encourage exploration without pressure or judgment. It creates space for writing, drawing, non-linear thinking, and personal reflection while focusing on energy, interests, boundaries, and self-awareness rather than performance or “fixing” behavior.

Designed to be flexible and self-paced, the journal has no required order, no expectation of completion, and no “correct” way to use it. It is intended for private reflection, optional supported use with trusted adults, coaching or educational settings, and as a companion to meaningful conversations rather than a replacement for them.

The What’s STRONG With You? Toolkit is a practical resource built around a simple but powerful shift in perspective: moving from asking “What’s wrong with you?” to “What’s strong with you?” Many systems—including education, workplaces, healthcare, and support environments—default to deficit-based thinking by focusing primarily on what needs fixing, what is not working, or what is missing, even when the intention is to be supportive. Over time, this shapes how people see themselves and how others see them.

The toolkit is designed to help challenge that mindset by reframing questions, language, and conversations around strengths, capability, potential, and human variation. Through practical tools, storytelling, reflective prompts, and engagement activities, it encourages people to look beyond deficits and build more balanced, respectful, and empowering ways of understanding neurodivergence and identity.

Designed for flexible use across different environments, the toolkit can support schools and educational settings, workplace culture initiatives, public awareness campaigns, coaching, facilitation, and community conversations. Rather than offering a one-size-fits-all model, it provides adaptable resources that help create more strengths-based and inclusive interactions in everyday life.

The NeuroEmergence Program is designed for people navigating the identity shifts that can happen after discovering, recognizing, or being diagnosed as neurodivergent. Recognition is often described as a moment of clarity or relief, but for many people it also brings grief, anger, confusion, exhaustion, or a deep re-evaluation of past experiences. After that initial realization, many are left without meaningful support for what comes next.

The program focuses not just on understanding neurodivergence, but on rebuilding a relationship with oneself after years of masking, misunderstanding, survival strategies, or unmet needs. It creates space for reinterpreting past experiences, understanding the emotional and physical costs of masking, redefining boundaries and identity, and making sense of the complexity that can emerge during this process. Rather than pushing people toward a fixed outcome, the program recognizes that identity shifts are deeply personal, non-linear, and often emotionally layered.

Designed to support people at different stages of self-recognition and change, the NeuroEmergence Program can be used during post-diagnosis adjustment, burnout recovery phases, identity transitions, and facilitated group environments. It offers space for reflection, exploration, and rebuilding without pressure, forced timelines, or expectations about who someone should become.

The EFURM Program is a program focused on energy, regulation, and long-term sustainability for neurodivergent people. It is not about productivity hacks, constant self-optimization, or pushing people to perform beyond their limits. Instead, the program centers on building ways of living and working that are actually sustainable over time, both emotionally and physically.

Many systems teach people to push through exhaustion, ignore discomfort, disconnect from their needs, and treat burnout as a personal failure rather than a warning sign. For neurodivergent people especially, this often creates repeated cycles of overextension, collapse, recovery, and burnout again. The program challenges those patterns by helping people better understand energy variability, recognize overload and shutdown patterns, separate self-worth from output, and redesign expectations in more realistic and supportive ways.

Through reflection, practical frameworks, and sustainable approaches to regulation and recovery, the EFURM Program supports people in rebuilding rhythms that work with their nervous system rather than against it. It is designed for personal development, coaching and facilitation settings, workplace wellbeing initiatives, and long-term recovery and sustainability journeys.

The Facilitator / Trainer Course is designed for trainers, educators, facilitators, and professionals who want to teach neurodiversity in a responsible, ethical, and meaningful way. The course is built on a simple principle: how neurodiversity is taught matters just as much as what is being taught. Even well-intentioned training can cause harm when complex lived experiences are oversimplified, reduced to slogans, or delivered without awareness of power, consent, and context.

Many neurodiversity training environments unintentionally create problems such as forced disclosure, tokenizing lived experience, extracting emotional labor from neurodivergent people, or presenting overly simplistic narratives that erase complexity. This course addresses those risks directly by exploring the ethics of facilitation, power dynamics in learning spaces, consent-based teaching practices, and ways to navigate discomfort, disagreement, and emotionally charged discussions with care and professionalism.

The course also focuses on translating neurodiversity theory into practical, real-world application across different environments and audiences. It is designed to help organizations train internal facilitators, improve the quality and integrity of neurodiversity education, professionalize facilitation practices, and prepare people to confidently deliver NEA content in ways that are respectful, informed, and sustainable.

The Educator / School Track is a course designed for teachers, school staff, and education professionals who want to embed neurodiversity into everyday teaching practice rather than treating inclusion as a separate initiative or occasional accommodation. The course focuses on turning inclusion from intention into practical, sustainable action within real classrooms and school systems.

Teachers are often told to “be inclusive” without being given the time, tools, flexibility, or structural support needed to make that possible. As a result, many educators are left trying to improvise within rigid systems that were not designed with neurodivergent students in mind. This course addresses that gap by providing practical, reality-based approaches that help educators better understand how learning, communication, sensory experiences, and regulation can differ across students.

The course explores neurodiversity-informed learning models, classroom and sensory design, rethinking expectations and assessment methods, and improving communication with students and families. Rather than offering abstract theory alone, it focuses on practical shifts that can be applied within existing educational environments. It is designed for teacher training and professional development, whole-school inclusion strategies, classroom-level improvements, and wider education reform initiatives.

The Leadership & Neuro-Inclusion course is an advanced program designed for leaders, executives, boards, and decision-makers who want to understand how power, systems, and organizational norms shape inclusion in practice. This course is not centered on empathy alone—it focuses on responsibility, accountability, and the reality that inclusion is ultimately shaped by leadership decisions, priorities, and structures.

Many inclusion efforts fail because responsibility is delegated downward while the systems, assumptions, and power structures that create exclusion remain untouched. Organizations often invest in awareness campaigns or individual accommodations while leadership practices, decision-making processes, and institutional norms continue to reinforce the same barriers. This course challenges leaders to examine the systems they shape and the unintended consequences of the environments they create.

Through exploration of power dynamics, hidden leadership assumptions, structural versus interpersonal inclusion, and real-world case reflections, the course encourages leaders to move beyond performative inclusion toward meaningful organizational change. It is designed for leadership teams, boards, organizational transformation initiatives, stalled inclusion efforts, and periods of growth or structural change where long-term cultural direction is being shaped.

The Neurodiversity Fundamentals course is a foundational program designed to explain neurodiversity as a practical, ethical, and systemic framework rather than simply a collection of diagnoses or labels. It gives individuals, teams, and organizations a clearer way to understand neurodiversity in real-world contexts, beyond trends, assumptions, or oversimplified awareness messaging.

Many people encounter neurodiversity through fragmented online content, medical models without social or environmental context, or workplace initiatives that prioritize buzzwords over understanding. The result is often confusion, resistance, shallow adoption, or conversations that quickly become disconnected from lived reality. This course creates a stronger shared foundation by introducing a common language and framework that can support more informed, grounded, and sustainable discussions about neurodiversity and inclusion.

The course explores core concepts of neurodiversity and human variation, the relationship between traits, identity, and environment, common myths and misconceptions, and the real-world implications for workplaces, education systems, and policy development. Combining theory with practical reflection, it is designed to be used as a starting point for teams and organizations, before implementing inclusion initiatives, to align groups with different levels of understanding, or as a reset point when conversations around neurodiversity have become confused, reactive, or unproductive.

The Brainy App is an educational app designed to help children, families, and educators understand neurodiversity in simple, relatable, and accessible ways. Rather than relying on clinical language or oversimplified slogans, the app helps turn complex ideas about brain differences into conversations that children and adults can actually engage with and understand together.

Neurodiversity is often explained either through medical jargon that feels distant and confusing, or through overly simplified messaging that loses nuance and meaning. Neither approach works particularly well for children who are still developing their understanding of themselves and others. The Brainy App bridges that gap by using strengths-aware explanations, visual metaphors, interactive content, and guided conversation prompts that make abstract concepts easier to explore in everyday life.

Designed to build shared understanding rather than assign labels, the app encourages curiosity, empathy, and open discussion around different ways of thinking, learning, feeling, and communicating. It can be used to start conversations with children, support classroom discussions, help families develop shared language, and explore brain differences without requiring diagnosis-focused frameworks.

The Stride App is a personal support tool designed to help people navigate daily life with more structure, awareness, and flexibility—without turning self-support into a productivity contest. Rather than focusing on constant optimization or performance, the app is built around the idea of creating gentle structure without pressure, helping people stay oriented in ways that feel sustainable and adaptable.

Many support and productivity tools rely heavily on tracking systems, streaks, accountability pressure, scoring, and optimization models. While those approaches can work for some people temporarily, they often become overwhelming, guilt-inducing, or unsustainable over time—especially for neurodivergent users navigating fluctuating energy, executive functioning challenges, or burnout. Stride takes a different approach by using gentle prompts instead of deadlines, reflection instead of scoring, and flexible structures that users can adapt, pause, ignore, or return to as needed.

The app is designed to meet people where they are on any given day, without moralizing productivity or attaching worth to consistency. It can help users notice patterns in energy and focus, create light structure without rigidity, maintain orientation during difficult periods, and support everyday functioning in a more compassionate and realistic way. Designed for flexible use, Stride encourages people to dip in and out based on need rather than pressure or obligation.

The NEA Community App is a dedicated community space designed to support people before, during, and after participating in NEA courses and programs. It focuses on the in-between moments where real learning, reflection, and integration often happen—after the workshop ends, once the initial emotions settle, or when questions only begin to surface later in everyday life.

Too often, learning experiences lose momentum as soon as a course finishes, a workshop ends, or a discussion channel becomes inactive. People lose connection, context, and the opportunity to continue processing ideas in ways that feel meaningful and applicable to real situations. The NEA Community App is designed to extend learning beyond the formal session by creating quieter, more sustainable spaces for ongoing reflection and connection.

The app includes course-linked discussion spaces, ongoing facilitator presence, shared resources, reflective conversations, and asynchronous participation that allows people to engage at their own pace without pressure to constantly contribute or perform. Rather than creating noise or demanding engagement, it provides space for people to think, revisit ideas, ask questions when they genuinely arise, stay connected across cohorts, and share experiences without needing everything to be polished, immediate, or fully figured out.

The Friends Fire ecosystem is a digital space for connection, friendship, and dating designed specifically with neurodivergent people in mind. More than just another social platform, it rethinks the social rules that most online spaces are built around. Traditional platforms often depend on fast responses, unspoken social expectations, performative profiles, ambiguous communication, and engagement-driven design that can feel exhausting, confusing, or unsafe for many neurodivergent users.

In many online environments, people end up masking heavily, second-guessing social signals, navigating unclear boundaries, or experiencing social burnout from the constant pressure to perform and stay visible. Friends Fire takes a different approach by shifting the focus from performance to clarity. Instead of rewarding speed, popularity, or endless engagement, the platform is designed around more intentional, transparent, and respectful interaction.

The ecosystem supports slower-paced communication, clearer signals and expectations, consent-aware design, and social interaction without manipulative or gamified engagement loops. Its goal is not to maximize attention or screen time, but to create an environment where people can feel safer, more understood, and more able to connect without constantly navigating hidden rules or social pressure.

The NIP Award Assessment Framework is a structured evaluation framework designed to assess political leaders on neuroinclusion based on measurable actions, policies, and long-term impact rather than visibility, public statements, or performative support. Political recognition is often shaped by optics, media presence, or good intentions, while the actual outcomes of policies and leadership decisions remain difficult to evaluate clearly or consistently.

Neuroinclusion in politics is frequently vague, poorly defined, and easy to present superficially without meaningful structural change. This framework addresses that gap by introducing clearer standards, evidence-based assessment, and greater accountability into how political leadership on neuroinclusion is evaluated. Rather than rewarding charisma or public relations messaging, it focuses on consistency, implementation, context, and demonstrable impact.

The framework evaluates policy decisions, leadership practices, and long-term commitments using real evidence rather than promotional narratives. It also accounts for political context and is designed to reduce bias linked to media visibility, personality, or public image. The NIP Award Assessment Framework can be used to assess nominees, support independent juries and review panels, and provide transparent reasoning behind recognition, evaluation, and decision-making processes.

Read about the winners

The Autvinder Evaluation Framework is a structured assessment tool designed to evaluate ideas and innovations fairly, without rewarding performance, confidence, or presentation style over substance. Created specifically with neurodivergent creators in mind, it challenges the way many competitions and innovation spaces prioritize social fluency, quick pitching, charisma, and polish instead of the actual value or potential of an idea.

Many strong ideas are overlooked because they are presented differently, do not fit expected formats, or are delivered without the confidence, speed, or social ease that traditional judging processes tend to reward. This framework separates the quality of the idea from the delivery style, helping juries focus on what matters: impact, originality, feasibility, relevance, and potential.

The framework provides clear evaluation criteria, bias-aware jury guidance, contextual interpretation, and a slower, more deliberate assessment process. By reducing reliance on charisma, speed, or performance, it creates a fairer way to recognize meaningful innovation and support neurodivergent creators whose ideas may otherwise be underestimated or misunderstood.

The Narrative Arc Framework is a communication framework designed to help people explain complex, sensitive, or challenging topics without losing clarity, creating unnecessary resistance, or compromising dignity. Rather than focusing only on what is being communicated, the framework focuses on the order and structure in which ideas are introduced, recognizing that sequence strongly shapes how people receive and respond to information.

When communication skips important stages, conversations often break down into defensiveness, confusion, misunderstanding, or disengagement. People may feel overwhelmed, judged, or disconnected before shared understanding has even been established. The Narrative Arc Framework addresses this by creating a more intentional pathway through difficult conversations and complex ideas.

The framework is built around five stages: Story, which creates a human entry point; Philosophy, which introduces the underlying worldview; Meaning, which builds shared understanding; Invitation, which encourages voluntary engagement rather than pressure; and Dignity, which reinforces unconditional human worth throughout the process. Missing one of these stages can weaken communication and reduce trust or engagement. The framework is designed for keynotes, campaigns, policy communication, training, facilitation, and situations involving mixed, resistant, or skeptical audiences where careful communication structure matters most.

The Neurodignity Framework is the ethical foundation that underpins the entire ecosystem. It defines the principles, boundaries, and standards for what meaningful inclusion, support, and participation should actually look like in practice. Rather than treating dignity as something conditional, aspirational, or secondary to performance, the framework establishes it as a non-negotiable starting point.

Many initiatives described as “inclusive” can still cause harm when they prioritize productivity over wellbeing, treat accessibility as optional, or expect neurodivergent people to constantly prove their value, adaptability, or worthiness of support. Neurodivergent individuals are often expected to endlessly adapt to systems that were never designed with them in mind, perform gratitude for basic inclusion, or earn dignity through output and compliance. The Neurodignity Framework rejects those assumptions entirely.

The framework is used to guide the design of tools, programs, policies, partnerships, governance decisions, and internal organizational choices across the ecosystem. It also acts as a reference point for evaluating whether initiatives genuinely align with neuroinclusive values in practice rather than only in language. Without a framework like this, inclusion can easily become performative or inconsistent. With it, dignity remains central, protected, and embedded into decision-making at every level.

The Neuro-Inclusive City Scorecard is a structured framework designed to help cities evaluate how inclusive they truly are for neurodivergent people across entire systems, not just through isolated policies or symbolic initiatives. Inclusion is often treated as a checklist item, compliance requirement, or niche social issue, but this framework reframes it as a broader question of system design, public infrastructure, and civic responsibility.

Rather than relying on simple pass/fail measures, the scorecard uses a multi-domain assessment approach that examines areas such as education, public spaces, governance, communication, accessibility, participation, and community life. It combines qualitative and quantitative inputs to identify patterns, strengths, blind spots, and systemic barriers across departments and institutions. The framework is designed with developmental logic in mind, helping cities understand not only where they currently stand, but also where improvement efforts should be focused next.

Used collaboratively with stakeholders, the scorecard can help establish a baseline for city-wide neuroinclusion, identify gaps between policy and lived experience, prioritize interventions, and track progress over time. More importantly, it shifts inclusion away from charity-based thinking and toward structural accountability by asking a more fundamental question: who is this city actually built for?

Neuroprofiler is a reflective tool designed to help individuals and teams better understand how neurodivergent patterns show up in everyday life, without reducing people to diagnoses, labels, fixed identities, or simplistic personality categories. Many neurodivergent experiences are routinely misunderstood or misinterpreted: exhaustion is seen as a lack of motivation, overwhelm is mistaken for resistance, and difference is treated as deficit rather than context-dependent variation.

Traditional diagnostic pathways are often slow, inaccessible, expensive, or heavily medicalized, while many personality tools flatten complexity and ignore the real-world needs, environments, and pressures that shape how people function. Neuroprofiler was created to sit between these extremes by offering a more human, contextual, and practical way to reflect on patterns of thinking, energy, communication, regulation, and interaction.

Rather than producing rigid labels or definitive categories, Neuroprofiler generates pattern-based insights that describe tendencies, friction points, and support needs in ways that encourage understanding and conversation. It can be used to prepare for workplace adjustments, improve team collaboration, support educator–student understanding, and help individuals reflect on their own patterns and needs more clearly. It is not a diagnosis, a hiring tool, a performance predictor, or a personality test. Instead of asking “What is wrong with this person?”, Neuroprofiler shifts the focus toward a different question: where is the mismatch between the person and the system around them?